Model comparison
GPT-4.1 mini vs Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Large 4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Mistral Large 4 leads 48.6 to 30.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleQA Verified: 12.7% for GPT-4.1 mini and 20% for Mistral Large 4.
- GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.68 / $2.09 for Mistral Large 4.
- Mistral Large 4 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1.05M.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral Large 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2026-10-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 33K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.68 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.60 | $2.09 |
| Results tracked | 47 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293), Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | 1475 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 23.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 32.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1541 |
| SciCode | 40.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 37.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.9% | — |
| CadEval | 16% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55), Mistral Large 4: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 50.5% | — |
Reasoning Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340), Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1349 | 1444 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 48.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 27.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 3.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 68.8% | — |
| LMCA | 21.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.01 | — |
Math Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270), Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1343 | 1488 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 6.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 44.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 49.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 87.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | — |
Knowledge Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194), Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.7% | 20% |
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | 1447 |
| GPQA Diamond | 65.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 61.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82), Mistral Large 4: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1181 | — |
Multilingual Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166), Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1415 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1329 | 1491 |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | 1414 |
| LMArena French | 1358 | — |
| LMArena German | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1319 | — |
Instruction Following Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118), Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1333 | 1424 |
| IFEval | 90.4% | — |
Long Context Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275), Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1429 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199), Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1300 | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1424 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| WildBench | 83.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 mini better than Mistral Large 4?
Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 mini or Mistral Large 4?
GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 lists at $0.68 and $2.09.
Is GPT-4.1 mini or Mistral Large 4 better for coding?
Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Large 4 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and Mistral Large 4 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 4 has 15.