Model comparison

GPT-4.1 mini vs Laguna M.1

GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 mini OpenAI

33.5

Rank #232 Confirmed

Laguna M.1 Poolside

31.9

Rank #252 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Laguna M.1 leads 21.9 to 10.9.
  • GPT-4.1 mini accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 mini and Laguna M.1 specifications
GPT-4.1 miniLaguna M.1
ProviderOpenAIPoolside
Noometry Index33.531.9
Released2025-04-142026-04-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output33K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$1.60—
Results tracked473

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Laguna M.1 leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 30.4 (#286), Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLaguna M.1
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)23.9%—
Aider Polyglot32.4%—
LMArena WebDev—1348
SciCode40.4%—
WeirdML37.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding1367—
CadEval16%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 33.0 (#52), Laguna M.1: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLaguna M.1
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard50.5%—

Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 10.9 (#335), Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLaguna M.1
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark48.6%—
ARC-AGI-13.5%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1349—
Mystery Game Puzzles7%—
DTBench68.8%—
LMCA21.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index135.01—

Math GPT-4.1 mini leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 23.1 (#264), Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLaguna M.1
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)6.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202544.7%—
ProofBench—0%
Omni-MATH49.1%—
LMArena Math1343—
MATH Level 587.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.5%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#183), Laguna M.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLaguna M.1
GPQA Diamond65.8%—
SimpleQA Verified12.7%—
MMLU-Pro78.3%—
GPQA (HELM)61.4%—
LMArena Expert1338—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 35.2 (#77), Laguna M.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLaguna M.1
LMArena Vision1181—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 45.9 (#161), Laguna M.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLaguna M.1
LMArena Non-English1318—
LMArena Chinese1329—
LMArena French1357—
LMArena German1349—
LMArena Japanese1291—
LMArena Korean1298—
LMArena Russian1324—
LMArena Spanish1319—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 73.9 (#113), Laguna M.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLaguna M.1
IFEval90.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1332—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#270), Laguna M.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLaguna M.1
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%—
LMArena Longer Query1344—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 48.8 (#193), Laguna M.1: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLaguna M.1
LMArena Text1341—
LMArena Creative Writing1300—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1147—
WildBench83.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1354—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 mini better than Laguna M.1?

GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.1 mini or Laguna M.1 better for coding?

Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 mini does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and Laguna M.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper