Model comparison
GPT-4.1 mini vs Grok 4
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 35 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 35 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 4 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 31.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 3.5% for GPT-4.1 mini and 66.7% for Grok 4.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 mini | Grok 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 48.1 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2025-07-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 47 | 48 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293), Grok 4: 50.3 (#46)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 32.4% | 79.6% |
| WeirdML | 37.6% | 45.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | 1408 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 23.9% | — |
| SciCode | 40.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.9% | — |
| CadEval | 16% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call
GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55), Grok 4: 32.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 50.5% | 63% |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
| GDPval | — | 21.1% |
| Cybench | — | 43% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 47.3% |
| BALROG | — | 43.6% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 66.6% |
Reasoning Grok 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340), Grok 4: 36.7 (#65)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | 16% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 48.6% | 73.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 3.5% | 66.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | 28% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1349 | 1409 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.01 | 146.44 |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.5% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 68.8% | — |
| LMCA | 21.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.9 |
Math Grok 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270), Grok 4: 48.4 (#64)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 44.7% | 84% |
| Omni-MATH | 49.1% | 60.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1343 | 1422 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | 19.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 6.7% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 87.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Grok 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194), Grok 4: 53.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.8% | 87% |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.3% | 85.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 61.4% | 72.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | 1415 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.7% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
Multimodal GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82), Grok 4: 33.7 (#94)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1181 | 1210 |
| GeoBench | — | 45% |
Multilingual Grok 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166), Grok 4: 51.8 (#103)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1403 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1329 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | 1358 | 1418 |
| LMArena German | 1351 | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1290 | 1394 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1377 |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | 1410 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1319 | 1420 |
Instruction Following Grok 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118), Grok 4: 79.2 (#5)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 90.4% | 94.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1333 | 1387 |
Long Context Grok 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275), Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | 94.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199), Grok 4: 58.5 (#116)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1300 | 1397 |
| WildBench | 83.8% | 79.7% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1416 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 mini better than Grok 4?
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4.1 mini or Grok 4 better for coding?
Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and Grok 4 share?
35 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.