Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Qwen3.5 Plus

GLM-5V-Turbo and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 42.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.1

Rank #86 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.3

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 47.9 to 36.6.
  • Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
  • Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Qwen3.5 Plus specifications
GLM-5V-TurboQwen3.5 Plus
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.142.3
Released2026-04-012026-02-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K1M
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1.20$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$4$2.40
Results tracked1915

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena WebDev1400—
LMArena Coding1467—
ALE-Bench—621.92

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen3.5 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—0.54

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen3.5 Plus
Chess Puzzles—22%
LMArena Hard Prompts1443—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—80.5%
LMCA—36.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.79

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109), Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1440—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen3.5 Plus
GPQA Diamond—84.8%
SimpleQA Verified—25.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.7%
LMArena Expert1451—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Non-English1420—
LMArena Chinese1488—
LMArena French1443—
LMArena German1422—
LMArena Korean1399—
LMArena Russian1432—
LMArena Spanish1446—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1422—

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76), Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen3.5 Plus
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%
LMArena Longer Query1439—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Text1437—
LMArena Creative Writing1414—
LMArena Multi-Turn1432—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

GLM-5V-Turbo and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 42.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper