Model comparison

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 OpenAI

43.8

Rank #82 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 38.6.

Side by side

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Qwen3.5 Plus specifications
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.5 Plus
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.842.9
Released—2026-02-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2.40
Results tracked2115

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 41.6 (#122), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Coding1413—
ALE-Bench—621.92

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.5 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—0.54

Reasoning Too close to call

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 33.8 (#71), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.5 Plus
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
Chess Puzzles—22%
LMArena Hard Prompts1424—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—80.5%
LMCA—36.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.78

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.6 (#134), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1407—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.2 (#137), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.5 Plus
GPQA Diamond—84.8%
SimpleQA Verified—25.4%
Confabulations16.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.7%
LMArena Expert1401—

Multimodal Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.6 (#58), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Vision1243—

Multilingual Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 52.9 (#76), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Non-English1419—
LMArena Chinese1457—
LMArena French1446—
LMArena German1423—
LMArena Japanese1405—
LMArena Korean1396—
LMArena Russian1429—
LMArena Spanish1434—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 74.0 (#107), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1403—

Long Context Too close to call

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 43.1 (#107), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.5 Plus
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%
LMArena Longer Query1413—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 62.6 (#72), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Text1429—
LMArena Creative Writing1405—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1501—
LMArena Multi-Turn1454—

Frequently asked questions

Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

How many benchmarks do Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper