Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 62.5.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1487 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1483 |
Math Too close to call
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1474 |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1489 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1444 | 1484 |
| LMArena German | 1423 | 1487 |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 1467 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.