Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 49.4.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1314 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1299 |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1298 |
Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1289 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1423 | 1231 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1444 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 1275 |
Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.