Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Qwen1.5-110B
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 38.0.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 34.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1184 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1185 |
Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1144 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Qwen1.5-110B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1444 | 1151 |
| LMArena German | 1423 | 1123 |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | 1142 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 1158 |
Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Qwen1.5-110B?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Qwen1.5-110B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.