Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs o1-mini
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 29.7 to 8.8.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 34.0 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1362 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1333 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1358 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 46.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1316 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), o1-mini: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1314 |
| LMArena French | 1444 | 1293 |
| LMArena German | 1423 | 1278 |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | 1223 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | 1303 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1245 |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |
Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | 1320 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than o1-mini?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or o1-mini better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and o1-mini share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.