Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Qwen Plus

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 3.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Plus in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 39.4 to 23.3.
  • Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
  • Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Qwen Plus specifications
GLM-5V-TurboQwen Plus
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.837.1
Released2026-04-012024-01-25
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K1M
Max output131K33K
Input $ / M tokens$1.20$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$4$1.20
Results tracked1920

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen Plus
LMArena Coding14661328
LMArena WebDev1401—

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts14431317
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.3%
DTBench—81.1%
LMCA—24%

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen Plus
LMArena Math14411326
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—17.8%
MATH Level 5—65.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen Plus
LMArena Expert14521328
GPQA Diamond—48.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Qwen Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen Plus
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen Plus
LMArena Non-English14201310
LMArena Chinese14881347
LMArena Russian14311323
LMArena French1444—
LMArena German1423—
LMArena Japanese—1251
LMArena Korean1396—
LMArena Spanish1450—

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14231303

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query14381324

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboQwen Plus
LMArena Text14371326
LMArena Creative Writing14161293
LMArena Multi-Turn14321336

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Qwen Plus?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 3.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Qwen Plus better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Qwen Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper