Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs GPT-4.5

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and GPT-4.5 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 29.7 to 13.9.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and GPT-4.5 specifications
GLM-5V-TurboGPT-4.5
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)OpenAI
Noometry Index43.837.2
Released2026-04-012025-02-27
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.20—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked1942

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4.5
LMArena Coding14661396
Aider Polyglot—44.9%
LMArena WebDev1401—
WeirdML—39.4%
LiveBench Coding—75.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: —, GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4.5
Cybench—17.5%

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14431403
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—34.5%
ARC-AGI-1—10.3%
EnigmaEval—3.2%
LiveBench Reasoning—71.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—64.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—136.74
ForecastBench—61.7
LiveBench—69%

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4.5
LMArena Math14411412
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—37.8%
LiveBench Math—69.3%
MATH Level 5—78.6%

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4.5
LMArena Expert14521394
GPQA Diamond—68.7%
Humanity's Last Exam—5.4%
Confabulations—13.6%

Multimodal GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4.5
LMArena Vision12641195
VPCT—45%
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4.5
LMArena Non-English14201413
LMArena Chinese14881421
LMArena French14441418
LMArena German14231457
LMArena Korean13961392
LMArena Russian14311419
LMArena Japanese—1416
LMArena Spanish1450—

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4.5
LMArena Instruction Following14231404
LiveBench Instruction Following—72.3%

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4.5
LMArena Longer Query14381406
Fiction.LiveBench—63.9%

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4.5
LMArena Text14371417
LMArena Creative Writing14161394
LMArena Multi-Turn14321444
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1258
LiveBench Language—61.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than GPT-4.5?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or GPT-4.5 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.1 vs 42.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and GPT-4.5 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.5 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper