Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 47.2.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 specifications
GLM-5V-TurboHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Tencent
Noometry Index43.837.9
Released2026-04-01—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.20—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked1912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding14661270
LMArena WebDev1401—

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts14431264

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Math14411274

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert14521248

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English14201262
LMArena Chinese14881319
LMArena Russian14311258
LMArena French1444—
LMArena German1423—
LMArena Korean1396—
LMArena Spanish1450—

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following14231245

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query14381301

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Text14371274
LMArena Creative Writing14161242
LMArena Multi-Turn14321275

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper