Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 47.2.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 37.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1270 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1264 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1274 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1248 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1245 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.