Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 4 categories and GPT-6 Luna in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Luna leads 76.1 to 39.4.
- GPT-6 Luna is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
- GPT-6 Luna accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 53.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 131K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Luna leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), GPT-6 Luna: 55.5 (#25)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | 1581 |
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1439 |
| DeepSWE | — | 66.6% |
| FrontierCode | — | 42.4% |
| SciCode | — | 54.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,577 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: —, GPT-6 Luna: 33.3 (#54)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 44.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23% |
Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), GPT-6 Luna: 48.2 (#41)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1411 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 59.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 68.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 86.7% |
| CritPt | — | 19.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 31% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 90.1% |
| LMCA | — | 44.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.28 |
Math GPT-6 Luna leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), GPT-6 Luna: 76.1 (#15)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1416 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 78.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 56.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 64% |
Knowledge GPT-6 Luna leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), GPT-6 Luna: 57.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1444 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.4% |
Multimodal GPT-6 Luna leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), GPT-6 Luna: 42.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | 1217 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 31.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 44.2% |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), GPT-6 Luna: 50.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1386 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1433 |
| LMArena French | 1444 | 1420 |
| LMArena German | 1423 | 1369 |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | 1360 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1394 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | 1393 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1369 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), GPT-6 Luna: 74.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 1409 |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), GPT-6 Luna: 43.0 (#111)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), GPT-6 Luna: 58.3 (#119)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1391 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1363 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1396 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or GPT-6 Luna better for coding?
GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6 Luna does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and GPT-6 Luna share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Luna has 42.