Model comparison
GLM-5.3 vs phi-3-medium 14B
GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3 scores higher in 3 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.3 leads 58.3 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 90.9% for GLM-5.3 and 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.
Side by side
| GLM-5.3 | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 54.8 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-08-14 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 42 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5.3 leads
GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 69% | — |
| FrontierCode | 40.1% | — |
| CursorBench | 42.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1622 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 30.2% | — |
| SciCode | 59% | — |
| WeirdML | 75.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1496 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,317 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 56.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 8,164 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.61 | 121.23 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 74.2% | — |
| CritPt | 19.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1489 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 33% | — |
| DTBench | 87.7% | — |
| LMCA | 55.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.15 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math GLM-5.3 leads
GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 68.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 29.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 49% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1489 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge GLM-5.3 leads
GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | 27.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1457 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1528 | — |
| LMArena French | 1499 | — |
| LMArena German | 1499 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1453 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1472 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1463 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1471 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1457 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2075 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1472 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5.3 better than phi-3-medium 14B?
GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5.3 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and phi-3-medium 14B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 42 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.