Model comparison

GLM-5.3 vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.6

Rank #25 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.1

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.3 leads 75.9 to 27.3.

Side by side

GLM-5.3 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
GLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index54.629.1
Released2026-08-142024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4119

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 59.0 (#12), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding14991040
DeepSWE69%—
FrontierCode40.1%—
LMArena WebDev1623—
FrontierSWE30.2%—
SciCode59%—
WeirdML75.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%
ALE-Bench1,317—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 36.3 (#34), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
APEX-Agents56.6%—
Vending-Bench 28,164—

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 45.2 (#42), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14911028
NYT Connections (extended)74.2%—
CritPt19.1%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
Mystery Game Puzzles33%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA55.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.56—

Math GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 62.1 (#27), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math14931089
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
ProofBench49%—

Knowledge GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#34), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1512984
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
SimpleQA Verified41%—

Multilingual GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 55.9 (#27), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14571000
LMArena Chinese15231016
LMArena French14991038
LMArena German15051006
LMArena Japanese1438899
LMArena Korean1478856
LMArena Russian14601004
LMArena Spanish14441058

Instruction Following GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 77.8 (#15), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14811023

Long Context GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 45.5 (#32), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1485996

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 75.9 (#6), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text14731050
LMArena Creative Writing14591024
LMArena Multi-Turn1473989
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2075—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3 better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.3 or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.0 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper