Model comparison

GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.0 H Small

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.6

Rank #25 Confirmed

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

35.9

Rank #213 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5.3 leads 62.1 to 29.3.

Side by side

GLM-5.3 and Granite 4.0 H Small specifications
GLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)IBM
Noometry Index54.635.9
Released2026-08-14—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4119

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 59.0 (#12), Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Coding14991247
DeepSWE69%—
FrontierCode40.1%—
LMArena WebDev1623—
FrontierSWE30.2%—
SciCode59%—
WeirdML75.4%—
ALE-Bench1,317—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 36.3 (#34), Granite 4.0 H Small: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
APEX-Agents56.6%—
Vending-Bench 28,164—

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 45.2 (#42), Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Hard Prompts14911240
NYT Connections (extended)74.2%—
CritPt19.1%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
Mystery Game Puzzles33%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA55.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.56—

Math GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 62.1 (#27), Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Math14931251
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
ProofBench49%—
Omni-MATH—29.6%

Knowledge GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#34), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Expert15121244
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
SimpleQA Verified41%—
MMLU-Pro—56.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.2%
GPQA (HELM)—38.3%

Multilingual GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 55.9 (#27), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Non-English14571216
LMArena Chinese15231250
LMArena Russian14601198
LMArena Spanish14441258
LMArena French1499—
LMArena German1505—
LMArena Japanese1438—
LMArena Korean1478—

Instruction Following GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 77.8 (#15), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Instruction Following14811221
IFEval—89%

Long Context GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 45.5 (#32), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Longer Query14851240

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 75.9 (#6), Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Text14731241
LMArena Creative Writing14591210
LMArena Multi-Turn14731243
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2075—
WildBench—73.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3 better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.3 or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.0 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper