Model comparison

GLM-5.3 vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.3 leads 75.7 to 48.7.
  • GLM-5.3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5.3 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
GLM-5.3Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Tencent
Noometry Index54.838.6
Released2026-08-14—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding14961307
DeepSWE69%—
FrontierCode40.1%—
CursorBench42.6%—
LMArena WebDev1622—
FrontierSWE30.2%—
SciCode59%—
WeirdML75.4%—
ALE-Bench1,317—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
APEX-Agents56.6%—
Vending-Bench 28,164—

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts14891286
NYT Connections (extended)74.2%—
CritPt19.1%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
Mystery Game Puzzles33%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA55.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.61—

Math GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math14891281
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
ProofBench49%—

Knowledge GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert15161276
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
SimpleQA Verified41%—

Multilingual GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English14571265
LMArena Chinese15281346
LMArena Russian14631266
LMArena French1499—
LMArena German1499—
LMArena Japanese1453—
LMArena Korean1472—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following14771277

Long Context GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query14821341

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text14711288
LMArena Creative Writing14571264
LMArena Multi-Turn14721284
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2075—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3 better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.3 or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper