Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 35.8.

Side by side

Gemini 4 Argon and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
Gemini 4 ArgonHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index56.538.6
Released2026-09-30—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding15501307
LMArena WebDev1678—
FrontierSWE55%—
SciCode61.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
APEX-Agents82.2%—
Vending-Bench 213,718—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts15481286
CritPt27.1%—

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math15361281
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert15531276

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English15231265
LMArena Chinese16101346
LMArena Russian15371266
LMArena Spanish1497—

Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following15381277

Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query15491341

Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text15341288
LMArena Creative Writing15311264
LMArena Multi-Turn15571284

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 4 Argon or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper