Model comparison

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Phi-3.5-MoE

GLM-5.3-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#45); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

49.6

Rank #45 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-MoE Microsoft

—

Unranked

Side by side

GLM-5.3-Flash and Phi-3.5-MoE specifications
GLM-5.3-FlashPhi-3.5-MoE
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index49.6—
Released2026-08-202024-08-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked363

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.7 (#26), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashPhi-3.5-MoE
DeepSWE63.4%—
FrontierCode31.8%—
LMArena WebDev1614—
SciCode51.6%—
LMArena Coding1506—
ALE-Bench303.55—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3-Flash: 34.3 (#41), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashPhi-3.5-MoE
APEX-Agents52.8%—
GDP.pdf14%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GLM-5.3-Flash: 31.7 (#69), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashPhi-3.5-MoE
CritPt15.4%—
Chess Puzzles14%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1490—
Mystery Game Puzzles8%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
Epoch Capabilities Index151.9—
PIQA—88.6%

Math Not comparable

GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.1 (#38), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashPhi-3.5-MoE
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)55.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.9%—
ProofBench21%—
LMArena Math1499—
GSM8K—88.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-5.3-Flash: 58.4 (#33), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashPhi-3.5-MoE
GPQA Diamond90.2%—
LMArena Expert1512—
BoolQ—84.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5.3-Flash: 42.6 (#25), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Vision1304—

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.2 (#24), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Non-English1462—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena French1495—
LMArena German1457—
LMArena Japanese1420—
LMArena Korean1443—
LMArena Russian1472—
LMArena Spanish1471—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GLM-5.3-Flash: 77.8 (#17), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Instruction Following1480—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.3 (#41), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Longer Query1479—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.4 (#49), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Text1471—
LMArena Creative Writing1440—
LMArena Multi-Turn1471—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3-Flash better than Phi-3.5-MoE?

GLM-5.3-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#45); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3-Flash and Phi-3.5-MoE share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3-Flash has 36 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper