Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Phi-3.5-MoE

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#48); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-MoE Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • Phi-3.5-MoE has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and Phi-3.5-MoE specifications
Muse Spark 1.2Phi-3.5-MoE
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index50.3—
Released2026-08-052024-08-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked313

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Phi-3.5-MoE
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1533—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—
LMArena Coding1495—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Phi-3.5-MoE
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Phi-3.5-MoE
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1486—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.87—
PIQA—88.6%

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Phi-3.5-MoE
ProofBench43%—
LMArena Math1471—
GSM8K—88.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Phi-3.5-MoE
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
LMArena Expert1480—
BoolQ—84.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Phi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Vision1305—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Phi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Non-English1478—
LMArena Chinese1511—
LMArena French1513—
LMArena Russian1487—
LMArena Spanish1498—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Phi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Instruction Following1461—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Phi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Longer Query1475—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Phi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Text1482—
LMArena Creative Writing1449—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—
LMArena Multi-Turn1494—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Phi-3.5-MoE?

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#48); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Phi-3.5-MoE share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper