Noometry

Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #43 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.6 to 42.9.
  • Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index49.935.3
Released2026-04-082024-06-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding14971209
DeepSWE53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1542—
SciCode58.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
τ²-bench Banking40.5%—
GBAEval7.9%—
GDP.pdf15%—
Vending-Bench 26,520—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14861202
NYT Connections (extended)84.9%—
CritPt15.1%—
DTBench94.4%—
LMCA49.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.32—

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math14771216
ProofBench39%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert14801171
SimpleQA Verified57.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Vision1292—
LMArena Document1465—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14711206
LMArena Chinese15181214
LMArena French14941196
LMArena German14661192
LMArena Japanese14451128
LMArena Korean14591148
LMArena Russian14821219
LMArena Spanish14711195

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14571203

Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14631225

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text14791225
LMArena Creative Writing14401203
LMArena Multi-Turn14841214
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1927—
EQ-Bench 41260—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper