Model comparison
GLM-5.3-Flash vs GLM-5V-Turbo
GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.8 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher in 9 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5.3-Flash leads 48.0 to 29.7.
- GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
- GLM-5.3-Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
- GLM-5.3-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-5.3-Flash | GLM-5V-Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 51.8 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2026-08-20 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 200K |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $4 |
| Results tracked | 40 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5.3-Flash leads
GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.1 (#31), GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1609 | 1401 |
| LMArena Coding | 1508 | 1466 |
| DeepSWE | 63.4% | — |
| FrontierCode | 31.8% | — |
| CursorBench | 36.8% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 18.1% | — |
| SciCode | 51.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 303.55 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-5.3-Flash: 34.2 (#47), GLM-5V-Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 52.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
Reasoning GLM-5.3-Flash leads
GLM-5.3-Flash: 48.0 (#42), GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1491 | 1443 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 65.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 91% | — |
| CritPt | 15.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 14% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 8% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 52.5% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.15 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.88 | — |
Math GLM-5.3-Flash leads
GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.3 (#47), GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1500 | 1441 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 93.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 21% | — |
Knowledge GLM-5.3-Flash leads
GLM-5.3-Flash: 58.4 (#36), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1513 | 1452 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.2% | — |
Multimodal GLM-5.3-Flash leads
GLM-5.3-Flash: 42.8 (#27), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | 1264 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |
Multilingual GLM-5.3-Flash leads
GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.0 (#25), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1462 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1527 | 1488 |
| LMArena French | 1496 | 1444 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1423 |
| LMArena Korean | 1446 | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | 1469 | 1431 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | 1450 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1429 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-5.3-Flash leads
GLM-5.3-Flash: 77.5 (#20), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1478 | 1423 |
Long Context GLM-5.3-Flash leads
GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.4 (#39), GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1438 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5.3-Flash leads
GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.3 (#50), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1471 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1442 | 1416 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1467 | 1432 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5.3-Flash better than GLM-5V-Turbo?
GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.8 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3-Flash or GLM-5V-Turbo?
GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.
Is GLM-5.3-Flash or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?
GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.1 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GLM-5.3-Flash does, with 1M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3-Flash and GLM-5V-Turbo share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3-Flash has 40 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.