Model comparison

GLM-5.1 vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.8

Rank #59 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.1 leads 66.9 to 42.7.

Side by side

GLM-5.1 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
GLM-5.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)NVIDIA
Noometry Index47.835.9
Released2026-04-072024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4117

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding14851209
SWE-bench Verified74.2%—
LMArena WebDev1508—
SciCode43.8%—
WeirdML57.1%—
ALE-Bench887.1—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
APEX-Agents40.9%—
ExploitBench18.1%—
GBAEval0%—
Vending-Bench 25,634—

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14721202
SimpleBench55.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)77.7%—
CritPt4.6%—
Chess Puzzles19%—
Thematic Generalization69.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.84—

Math GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math14731216
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)36.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions67.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench22.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)33.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)12.5%—

Knowledge GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert14761171
GPQA Diamond89.9%—
SimpleQA Verified34%—

Multilingual GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14471206
LMArena Chinese15151214
LMArena French14741197
LMArena German14651192
LMArena Japanese14341128
LMArena Korean14181148
LMArena Russian14541219
LMArena Spanish14691195

Instruction Following GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14511203

Long Context GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14661225

Writing & Preference GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text14611225
LMArena Creative Writing14531203
LMArena Multi-Turn14721214
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1592—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.1 better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.1 or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.1 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.1 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper