Model comparison
GLM-4.7 vs Mistral Large
GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Large in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.7 leads 38.6 to 18.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 83.3% for GLM-4.7 and 8.5% for Mistral Large.
- GLM-4.7 is cheaper at $0.60 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Mistral Large.
- GLM-4.7 accepts more context: 205K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7 | Mistral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.0 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2025-12-22 | 2024-02-26 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 36 | 51 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79), Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 45.1% | 36.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1277 |
| ALE-Bench | 399.48 | 264.7 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1435 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 30% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 47.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 62.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 59.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Mistral Large leads
GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103), Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 33.4% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 38.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 2,377 | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164), Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 47.7% | 22.5% |
| CritPt | 1.7% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1257 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.51 | 128.52 |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 43.5% |
| DTBench | — | 65.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 50.1% |
| LMCA | — | 16.7% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| LiveBench | — | 48.4% |
Math GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135), Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.3% | 8.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1423 | 1262 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.4% | 0.3% |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 28.1% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 42.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 50.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80), Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 51.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.7% | 4.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1424 | 1232 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 32.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 59.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 21.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 43.5% |
| MMLU | — | 80% |
Multilingual GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79), Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1237 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1432 | 1325 |
| LMArena German | 1424 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1439 | 1188 |
| LMArena Korean | 1399 | 1202 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1257 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | 1268 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95), Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1249 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 67.9% |
| IFEval | — | 87.7% |
Long Context GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116), Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1432 | 1261 |
| CL-bench | 15.9% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 10.9% | — |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93), Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1266 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1243 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1413 | 985 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | 1260 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 69% |
| WildBench | — | 80.1% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 39.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7 better than Mistral Large?
GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7 or Mistral Large?
GLM-4.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Large lists at $2 and $6.
Is GLM-4.7 or Mistral Large better for coding?
GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 34.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GLM-4.7 does, with 205K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7 and Mistral Large share?
27 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large has 51.