Noometry

Model comparison

GLM-4.7 vs Hunyuan Large Vision

GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.7 Z.ai (Zhipu)

41.7

Rank #117 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.0

Rank #198 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.7 leads 61.1 to 46.7.
  • GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-4.7Hunyuan Large Vision
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Tencent
Noometry Index41.737.0
Released2025-12-22—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.60—
Output $ / M tokens$2.20—
Results tracked3613

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 43.6 (#74), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding14541307
LMArena WebDev1435—
SciCode45.1%—
ALE-Bench399.48—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 26.4 (#96), Hunyuan Large Vision: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hunyuan Large Vision
Terminal-Bench33.4%—
Vending-Bench 22,377—

Reasoning Too close to call

GLM-4.7: 23.7 (#161), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts14431257
SimpleBench47.7%—
CritPt1.7%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index143.53—

Math GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 37.7 (#92), Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math14231269
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202583.3%—
ProofBench6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)2.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#74), Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert14241250
GPQA Diamond83.3%—
SimpleQA Verified32.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-4.7: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision—1180

Multilingual GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 53.0 (#75), Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English14171236
LMArena Chinese14951289
LMArena Russian14231243
LMArena French1432—
LMArena German1426—
LMArena Japanese1439—
LMArena Korean1401—
LMArena Spanish1433—

Instruction Following GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 74.6 (#90), Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following14111250

Long Context GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#111), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query14321279
CL-bench15.9%—
CL-bench Life10.9%—

Writing & Preference GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 61.1 (#89), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text14361263
LMArena Creative Writing14011250
LMArena Multi-Turn14461253
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1413—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.7 better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.7 or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7 and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper