Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 1 category and Step 3.5 Flash in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 58.8 to 46.5.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Hunyuan Large VisionStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderTencentStepFun
Noometry Index37.642.3
Released—2026-01-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding13081436

Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts12571411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math12681408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%

Knowledge Step 3.5 Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert12521421

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Step 3.5 Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English12361385
LMArena Chinese12871447
LMArena Russian12431385
LMArena French—1421
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1354
LMArena Korean—1352
LMArena Spanish—1419

Instruction Following Step 3.5 Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12511385

Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query12801402

Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text12631403
LMArena Creative Writing12481357
LMArena Multi-Turn12541405

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Step 3.5 Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper