Model comparison

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.7-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.8

Rank #180 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 46.5 to 25.9.

Side by side

GLM-4.7-Flash and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 specifications
GLM-4.7-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index38.831.3
Released2026-01-19—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.06—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked2115

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 31.8 (#279)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Coding13831093

Reasoning Too close to call

GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 20.8 (#231)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Hard Prompts13561087
Chess Puzzles0%—

Math GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 33.0 (#208)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Math13551152
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202558.3%—

Knowledge GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 28.6 (#244)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Expert13571051
GPQA Diamond60.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—

Multilingual GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 25.9 (#282)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Non-English13301013
LMArena Chinese14031033
LMArena German13371031
LMArena Korean1283880
LMArena Russian13321019
LMArena French1332—
LMArena Japanese—954
LMArena Spanish1350—

Instruction Following GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 54.1 (#282)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Instruction Following13271058

Long Context GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 31.7 (#277)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Longer Query13451042

Writing & Preference GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 29.6 (#294)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Text13511080
LMArena Creative Writing12971045
LMArena Multi-Turn13421049
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1125—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper