Noometry

Model comparison

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Palm 2

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.7-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.8

Rank #180 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 46.5 to 20.9.
  • GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-4.7-FlashPalm 2
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Google
Noometry Index38.830.0
Released2026-01-19—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.06—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked2110

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPalm 2
LMArena Coding1383994

Reasoning GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPalm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts13561005
Chess Puzzles0%—

Math GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPalm 2
LMArena Math13551049
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202558.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184), Palm 2: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPalm 2
GPQA Diamond60.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
LMArena Expert1357—

Multilingual GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPalm 2
LMArena Non-English1330916
LMArena Chinese1403887
LMArena French1332—
LMArena German1337—
LMArena Korean1283—
LMArena Russian1332—
LMArena Spanish1350—

Instruction Following GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPalm 2
LMArena Instruction Following13271010

Long Context GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPalm 2
LMArena Longer Query13451010

Writing & Preference GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashPalm 2
LMArena Text13511027
LMArena Creative Writing1297991
LMArena Multi-Turn1342994
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1125—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Palm 2?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Palm 2 better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper