Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Grok 4.1
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.1 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.4 to 47.4.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135), Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1445 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: —, Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229), Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1435 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1355 | 1422 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184), Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1417 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158), Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1337 | 1446 |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | 1438 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1397 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167), Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1400 |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210), Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1437 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Grok 4.1?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Grok 4.1 better for coding?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Grok 4.1 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.