Model comparison

GLM-4.6V vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.6V Z.ai (Zhipu)

41.3

Rank #137 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 29.6.

Side by side

GLM-4.6V and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 specifications
GLM-4.6VPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index41.331.3
Released2025-12-08—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$0.90—
Results tracked1215

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 31.8 (#279)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Coding13901093

Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 20.8 (#231)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Hard Prompts13681087

Math Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 33.0 (#208)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Math—1152

Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 28.6 (#244)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Expert13711051

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Vision1164—

Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 25.9 (#282)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Non-English13591013
LMArena Chinese14251033
LMArena Russian13401019
LMArena German—1031
LMArena Japanese—954
LMArena Korean—880

Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 54.1 (#282)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Instruction Following13521058

Long Context GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 31.7 (#277)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Longer Query13581042

Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 29.6 (#294)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Text13771080
LMArena Creative Writing13471045
LMArena Multi-Turn13601049

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.6V better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.6V or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper