Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Nova Premier 1.0
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 51.0.
- GLM-4.6V is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Nova Premier 1.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 38.3 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | 2025-04-30 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 10K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | $12.50 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 44.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | — |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 35% |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 51.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 80.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | — |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | — |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Nova Premier 1.0?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V or Nova Premier 1.0?
GLM-4.6V is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Nova Premier 1.0 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.