Model comparison

GLM-4.6 vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.6 Z.ai (Zhipu)

40.9

Rank #132 Confirmed

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.2

Rank #193 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6 leads 61.3 to 47.4.
  • GLM-4.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-4.6 and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 specifications
GLM-4.6Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Tencent
Noometry Index40.937.2
Released2025-09-30—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.60—
Output $ / M tokens$2.20—
Results tracked2912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 39.9 (#137), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding14491270
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)55.4%—
LMArena WebDev1339—
SciCode38.4%—
ALE-Bench340.82—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-4.6: 32.1 (#60), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Terminal-Bench24.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard72.4%—

Reasoning Too close to call

GLM-4.6: 23.1 (#168), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts14401264
Kagi LLM Benchmark47.4%—
CritPt1.1%—

Math GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 36.4 (#115), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Math14311274
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 39.6 (#118), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert14321248
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.5%—

Multilingual GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 53.6 (#62), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English14261262
LMArena Chinese15001319
LMArena Russian14181258
LMArena French1459—
LMArena German1447—
LMArena Japanese1394—
LMArena Korean1401—
LMArena Spanish1436—

Instruction Following GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 74.5 (#93), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following14101245

Long Context GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#91), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query14231301

Writing & Preference GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 61.3 (#86), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Text14401274
LMArena Creative Writing14111242
LMArena Multi-Turn14271275
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1411—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.6 better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.6 or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?

GLM-4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6 and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6 has 29 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper