Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.1 to 52.7.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 44.7 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1488 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | 1483 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1353 | 1473 |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1489 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | 1534 |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | 1470 |
| LMArena French | — | 1483 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1467 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | 1477 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5V or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.