Noometry

Model comparison

GLM-4.5V vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Nemotron 3 Ultra is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5V Z.ai (Zhipu)

39.2

Rank #158 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Ultra NVIDIA

44.7

Rank #71 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 2 categories and Nemotron 3 Ultra in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3 Ultra leads 52.5 to 36.8.
  • GLM-4.5V is cheaper at $0.60 / $1.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.40 for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
  • Nemotron 3 Ultra accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 64K.

Side by side

GLM-4.5VNemotron 3 Ultra
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)NVIDIA
Noometry Index39.244.7
Released2025-08-112026-06-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window64K262K
Max output16K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.60$0.60
Output $ / M tokens$1.80$2.40
Results tracked1529

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.5V leads

GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 37.7 (#174)

BenchmarkGLM-4.5VNemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Coding13471468
FrontierCode—13.6%
SciCode—40.3%
WeirdML—43.5%

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 30.3 (#78)

BenchmarkGLM-4.5VNemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Hard Prompts13351452
Kagi LLM Benchmark59.8%—
CritPt—3.1%
Chess Puzzles—12%
Mystery Game Puzzles—20%
DTBench—90.1%
LMCA—36.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.2

Math Too close to call

GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 34.4 (#160)

BenchmarkGLM-4.5VNemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Math13531456
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
ProofBench—2%

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 52.5 (#56)

BenchmarkGLM-4.5VNemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Expert13531472
GPQA Diamond—85.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86), Nemotron 3 Ultra: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.5VNemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Vision1154—

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 53.7 (#61)

BenchmarkGLM-4.5VNemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Non-English13041427
LMArena Chinese13381498
LMArena Russian12991415
LMArena Spanish13351452
LMArena French—1475
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Korean—1387

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 74.9 (#84)

BenchmarkGLM-4.5VNemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Instruction Following13111417

Long Context Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 43.9 (#77)

BenchmarkGLM-4.5VNemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Longer Query13051437

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 66.3 (#35)

BenchmarkGLM-4.5VNemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text13331444
LMArena Creative Writing12951392
LMArena Multi-Turn13331412
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1692

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5V better than Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

GLM-4.5V is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra lists at $0.60 and $2.40.

Is GLM-4.5V or Nemotron 3 Ultra better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Ultra does, with 262K tokens against 64K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Nemotron 3 Ultra share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Ultra has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper