Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.5V leads 27.4 to 22.4.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | — |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5V or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.