Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Mistral Small
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral Small in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.5V leads 37.4 to 16.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 59.8% for GLM-4.5V and 37.8% for Mistral Small.
- Mistral Small is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $1.80 for GLM-4.5V.
- Mistral Small accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 64K.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Mistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2024-02-26 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 64K | 262K |
| Max output | 16K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | $0.60 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1362 |
| SciCode | — | 26.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 36.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 36.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 497.62 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: —, Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 37.1% |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | 37.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1335 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 44.8% |
| DTBench | — | 70.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 53.7% |
| LMCA | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 44% |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1341 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 5.8% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 39.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 46.8% |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1291 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.1% |
| MMLU | — | 68.7% |
Multimodal Too close to call
GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | 1142 |
Multilingual Too close to call
GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1315 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1340 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1324 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1346 |
| LMArena French | — | 1337 |
| LMArena German | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1310 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 63.7% |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 1327 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1338 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1305 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 1344 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 30.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Mistral Small?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Mistral Small?
Mistral Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5V lists at $0.60 and $1.80.
Is GLM-4.5V or Mistral Small better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Small does, with 262K tokens against 64K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Mistral Small share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small has 39.