Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 37.5.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 45.8 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2025-11-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1428 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1439 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1456 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1406 |
| LMArena French | — | 1425 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1330 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1403 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 1414 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5V or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.