Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Granite 4.0 H Small
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.7 to 44.0.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 35.9 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152), Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1247 |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118), Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | 1240 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157), Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1353 | 1251 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1244 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86), Granite 4.0 H Small: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | 1250 |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | 1198 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | 1258 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1221 |
| IFEval | — | 89% |
Long Context GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | 1240 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162), Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | 1243 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5V or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.