Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Grok Build 0.1
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 27.4.
- GLM-4.5V is cheaper at $0.60 / $1.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
- Grok Build 0.1 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 64K.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Grok Build 0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2026-04-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 64K | 256K |
| Max output | 16K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: —, Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | — |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Grok Build 0.1?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Grok Build 0.1?
GLM-4.5V is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.
Is GLM-4.5V or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok Build 0.1 does, with 256K tokens against 64K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Grok Build 0.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.