Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.9

Rank #177 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5-Air scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 55.9 to 27.6.

Side by side

GLM-4.5-Air and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
GLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index38.927.9
Released2025-07-202024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output98K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$1.10—
Results tracked2735

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding13971093
GSO2.9%—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13791072
Kagi LLM Benchmark43%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
ForecastBench59.2—
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math13961111
Omni-MATH39.1%—
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert13701045
Humanity's Last Exam8.1%—
MMLU-Pro76.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13661021
LMArena Chinese14261021
LMArena French13991076
LMArena German13771044
LMArena Japanese1348935
LMArena Korean1308905
LMArena Russian13731022
LMArena Spanish13861085

Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13541053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%
IFEval81.2%—

Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13661044

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text13841073
LMArena Creative Writing13431037
LMArena Multi-Turn13711018
WildBench78.9%—
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5-Air better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.5-Air or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

GLM-4.5-Air scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.3 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5-Air and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5-Air has 27 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper