Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.1 vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.1 MiniMax

38.4

Rank #177 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.4

Rank #324 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 58.5 to 27.7.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.1 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
MiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderMiniMaxMicrosoft
Noometry Index38.427.4
Released2025-12-232024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked2235

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 40.1 (#132), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.1 (#319)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding14211093
LMArena WebDev1384—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
ALE-Bench623.83—
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.1: 27.7 (#91), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
Terminal-Bench36.6%—

Reasoning MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 15.8 (#301), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 13.6 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14101072
NYT Connections (extended)11.2%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 35.6 (#142), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 24.5 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math13961111
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 37.7 (#143), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.9 (#241)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert14321045
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.8%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 50.2 (#123), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.5 (#275)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13781021
LMArena Chinese14301021
LMArena French14051075
LMArena German13801044
LMArena Japanese1287935
LMArena Korean1297905
LMArena Russian13861022
LMArena Spanish13961084

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 74.0 (#108), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 48.0 (#298)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13991053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#98), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#271)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14161044

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 58.5 (#114), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.7 (#295)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text13921073
LMArena Creative Writing13621037
LMArena Multi-Turn13961018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.1 better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2.1 or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.1 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.1 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper