Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GLM-4.5-Air
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.4 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and GLM-4.5-Air in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 41.7 to 34.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 67.2% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 43% for GLM-4.5-Air.
- GLM-4.5-Air is cheaper at $0.20 / $1.10 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.50 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- GLM-4.5-Air has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 40.4 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | 2025-07-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 66K | 98K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $1.10 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.5 (#179), GLM-4.5-Air: 34.5 (#225)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1397 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| GSO | — | 2.9% |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 29.9 (#72), GLM-4.5-Air: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.3 (#181), GLM-4.5-Air: 23.3 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | 43% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1379 |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | 59.2 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.45 | — |
Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.5 (#82), GLM-4.5-Air: 33.8 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1396 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 39.1% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.7 (#95), GLM-4.5-Air: 34.6 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | 8.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | 9.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1370 |
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 76.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 59.4% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 38.7 (#57), GLM-4.5-Air: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.5 (#82), GLM-4.5-Air: 49.4 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1366 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | 1423 | 1399 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1376 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1411 | 1348 |
| LMArena Korean | 1393 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1385 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.9 (#126), GLM-4.5-Air: 69.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | 1353 |
| IFEval | — | 81.2% |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#117), GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1367 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 61.0 (#90), GLM-4.5-Air: 56.1 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1384 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1371 |
| WildBench | — | 78.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than GLM-4.5-Air?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.4 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GLM-4.5-Air?
GLM-4.5-Air is cheaper. It lists at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite lists at $0.25 and $1.50.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GLM-4.5-Air better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.5 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GLM-4.5-Air share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.