Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 62.2 to 27.1.
  • Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 7B and Qwen3.6 Plus specifications
Gemma 7BQwen3.6 Plus
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.047.5
Released2024-02-212026-03-31
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$3
Results tracked2737

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Coding10481467
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
LMArena WebDev—1461
SciCode—40.7%
ALE-Bench—670.15
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts10421449
Epoch Capabilities Index111.99147.65
NYT Connections (extended)—60.3%
CritPt—2.9%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Thematic Generalization—59.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—81.9%
LMCA—33.1%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Math10661450
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Expert10011454
GPQA Diamond—88.4%
SimpleQA Verified—44.1%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English9991424
LMArena Chinese10351477
LMArena French10251455
LMArena Russian9931434
LMArena German—1452
LMArena Japanese—1389
LMArena Korean—1379
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following10171425

Long Context Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Longer Query10221439
CL-bench—20.3%

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text10561437
LMArena Creative Writing10241404
LMArena Multi-Turn9631438

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper