Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs o3-mini

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

29.5

Rank #295 Confirmed

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #205 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 2 categories and o3-mini in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where o3-mini leads 75.3 to 51.7.
  • Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 7B and o3-mini specifications
Gemma 7Bo3-mini
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index29.536.7
Released2024-02-212024-12-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.10
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked2751

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-mini leads

Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290), o3-mini: 41.4 (#116)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo3-mini
LMArena Coding10481378
Aider Polyglot—60.4%
SciCode—39.8%
GSO—1.3%
WeirdML—43.7%
LiveBench Coding—82.7%
CadEval—54%
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, o3-mini: 29.3 (#79)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo3-mini
Cybench—22.5%

Reasoning Gemma 7B leads

Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247), o3-mini: 16.3 (#295)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo3-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts10421366
Epoch Capabilities Index111.74140.35
ARC-AGI-2—3%
SimpleBench—22.8%
ARC-AGI-1—34.5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—17%
LiveBench Reasoning—89.6%
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—68.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—70.6%
LMCA—19%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
ForecastBench—59.6
HellaSwag82.2%—
LiveBench—75.9%
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math Gemma 7B leads

Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225), o3-mini: 27.6 (#236)

Knowledge o3-mini leads

Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248), o3-mini: 38.3 (#135)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo3-mini
LMArena Expert10021364
GPQA Diamond—77%
SimpleQA Verified—15.3%
Confabulations—17.9%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multilingual o3-mini leads

Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282), o3-mini: 45.9 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo3-mini
LMArena Non-English9991319
LMArena Chinese10351379
LMArena French10241333
LMArena Russian9931304
LMArena German—1303
LMArena Japanese—1286
LMArena Korean—1314
LMArena Spanish—1321

Instruction Following o3-mini leads

Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290), o3-mini: 75.3 (#67)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo3-mini
LMArena Instruction Following10171338
LiveBench Instruction Following—84.4%

Long Context o3-mini leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277), o3-mini: 33.8 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo3-mini
LMArena Longer Query10221343
Fiction.LiveBench—50%

Writing & Preference o3-mini leads

Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297), o3-mini: 50.4 (#177)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo3-mini
LMArena Text10561337
LMArena Creative Writing10241286
LMArena Multi-Turn9631320
Short-Story Creative Writing—61.7%
LiveBench Language—50.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than o3-mini?

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or o3-mini better for coding?

o3-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and o3-mini share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper