Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Gemma 7B
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 7B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.1 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 30.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1048 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1042 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.99 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1066 |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1001 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1017 |
Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1022 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 963 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Gemma 7B?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Gemma 7B better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Gemma 7B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.