Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Grok Build 0.1
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 43.1 to 30.5.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2026-04-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 7B: —, Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Grok Build 0.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.