Model comparison
Command A vs Gemma 7B
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 7B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command A leads 47.8 to 27.2.
Side by side
| Command A | Gemma 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 29.5 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 7B leads
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1048 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Gemma 7B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 7B leads
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1042 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.74 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1066 |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1002 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 1024 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1017 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1022 |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 963 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Gemma 7B?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Gemma 7B better for coding?
Gemma 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.9 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemma 7B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.