Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs Grok 4.1 Fast

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

Grok 4.1 Fast xAI

41.4

Rank #136 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 57.2 to 27.1.
  • Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 7B and Grok 4.1 Fast specifications
Gemma 7BGrok 4.1 Fast
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index30.041.4
Released2024-02-212025-06-27
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked2732

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Coding10481411
LMArena WebDev—1242
ALE-Bench—394.93
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.1 Fast
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—69.6%
τ²-bench Banking—13.1%
LMArena Search—1171
Vending-Bench 2—1,107

Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Hard Prompts10421407
SimpleBench—56%
NYT Connections (extended)—87.4%
DTBench—87.7%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index111.99—
ForecastBench—61
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math Too close to call

Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Math10661408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.9%
ProofBench—4%
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Expert10011399
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.8%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Vision—1201

Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Non-English9991391
LMArena Chinese10351441
LMArena French10251415
LMArena Russian9931387
LMArena German—1404
LMArena Japanese—1349
LMArena Korean—1361
LMArena Spanish—1413

Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following10171376

Long Context Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Longer Query10221390

Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Text10561408
LMArena Creative Writing10241394
LMArena Multi-Turn9631389
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1327

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?

Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Grok 4.1 Fast share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper