Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen1.5-110B

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.2

Rank #85 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.6

Rank #231 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 60.7 to 38.1.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B IT and Qwen1.5-110B specifications
Gemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-110B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.233.6
Released2026-04-022024-04-25
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.09—
Output $ / M tokens$0.34—
Results tracked3520

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.9 (#98), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding14591184
LMArena WebDev1364—
SciCode43.4%—
WeirdML52.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%
ALE-Bench925.5—

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 26.4 (#119), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts14481168
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
Thematic Generalization53%—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74—
ForecastBench—57.7

Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.3 (#72), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math14641185
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—

Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#141), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert14651144
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.0 (#32), Qwen1.5-110B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Vision1278—
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 54.0 (#52), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English14311142
LMArena Chinese14781206
LMArena French14361150
LMArena Russian14621118
LMArena Spanish14431141
LMArena German—1123
LMArena Japanese—1074
LMArena Korean—1044

Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.6 (#58), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following14331158

Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#67), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query14461157

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.7 (#92), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text14431175
LMArena Creative Writing14161148
LMArena Multi-Turn14521160
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368—
EQ-Bench 41120—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Qwen1.5-110B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper